Two (2) definite No
One (1) Unlikely
One (1) Not sure
Five (5) Yes (including Indeed and certainly)
One (1) Very Likely
One (1) Perhaps
And finally one (1) "I hope so"
If you look at these numbers again, 33% (4 out of 12) said no or are more inclined toward no.
58% (7 out of 12) said yes or are more toward yes and there is one with hope.
I liked Elie Wiesel answer too which was "I hope so, and if it doesn’t, it’s up to us to give it one."
Also Lawrence M. Krauss answer is very logical " While nothing in biology, chemistry, physics, geology, astronomy, or cosmology has ever provided direct evidence of purpose in nature, science can never unambiguously prove that there is no such purpose. As Carl Sagan said, in another context: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Of course, nothing would stop science from uncovering positive evidence of divine guidance and purpose if it were attainable. For example, tomorrow night if we look up at the stars and they have been rearranged into a pattern that reads, "I am here," I think even the most hard-nosed scientific skeptic would suspect something was up..."
P.S. Picture is from here
P.S. Picture is from here
3 comments:
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"; simple and right.
Rather interesting subject, Hiva. Unfortunately, you didn't say what you think about it.
As to me, I don't think there is a purpose, but nobody can prove this, we are simply too small and unimportant to be able to do so.
Cheers and welcome to a happy and eventful life (even without purpose).
Georg
George,
My answer is "I don't know but I hope so :)"
Behi, I liked that phrase too
Post a Comment